南豐集團陳慧慧，又再上訴追擊母親，勢要摞翻220億，惹來法庭不滿，個官都睇唔過眼！暗示「唔好將法庭變為你地有錢人嘅遊樂場」。睇下個官點講嘅：15. Thirdly, it is suggested that these matters should be remitted back to the CA with the view to having the appeal resolved before dealing with the Locus and Joinder Summonses. This is contrary to the CA’s decision to remit these matters back to the CFI and, effectively, they would have travelled an entire circle, after having wasted a good deal of time and costs. Assuming that it is within the power of this court to have these matters send back to the CA, I see no good reason so to do, not to mention further delay. This suggestion is therefore also rejected.
16. Finally, it must be made clear that, with the resources at their disposal, the Defendants are in the position to obtain whatever legal advice they desire. No doubt they would conduct their case as they see fit, but they must accept the legal consequences which flow from their conduct. It is not the function of the court to preserve their options.
17. I consider Aldi Stores to be inapplicable to this case. In any case, it would not be possible or appropriate for this court to “manage” the case on the basis of a challenge to the validity of the Deed which has not arisen and may not materialise.